Hope in our midst

Rich Harwood has recently written some interesting comments on hope, particularly as it applies to its use in political circles. He writes, “Hope is the result of people tapping their own potential to make a difference and joining together to forge a common future.” Within the context of the governing process, that is about as excellent a definition as we have seen, and it is exactly the kind of hope the Institute seeks to build not only with our membership, our Congressional Student Forums, and our student trips to Washington, but also with the encouragement we give to one another in our day to day interactions. Together we can make civility, respect, and mutual cooperation the norm - in our homes, our communities, and our nation. It may sound like a dream - but truly the best human achievements have always started that way. It is hard work and commitment that make the dreams come true.

The Challenge of Dialogue

The recent visit of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Columbia University was controversial simply by virtue of having taken place. Many believed Columbia was wrong in extending an invitation to him. Others felt like the “welcome” he received was inappropriately harsh. Still others were frustrated by Ahmadinejad’s refusal to provide direct answers to direct questions. All of this is an excellent example of how extremely difficult true dialogue can be when the differences that separate us are so very deep. It takes extreme care, wisdom, patience, and sensitivity. It should also be recognized that none of this takes place in a vacuum, but rather in historical and cultural contexts that are at once real and personal. However, we should not let the difficulties of the challenge prevent us from undertaking the effort to engage in honest and civil discussion, for it is in that context that truths most readily emerge.